What about the injunction that Heini Mader (1994 engine supplier) took out before Spa?
This is one thing that has really annoyed me over the past week. On Friday, several of the UK broadsheets and tabloids wrote that we were in court because we hadn’t paid a bill of $100,000 to Heini Mader. This is true BUT we have chosen not to pay the bill. What happened is that in 1994 we had more engines let go on us than any other team (possibly excluding McLaren-Peugeot??). We asked Mader to explain this and he said it was a problem unrelated to the engine building done by them. We have since discovered that Mader used some second hand parts in our engines and we refused to pay for a number of the rebuilds caused by the blow-ups that they said we should (* According to Autosport, Keith Wiggins, the team owner, signed an agreement to pay in Adelaide last season before Mader allowed Pacific to race *). In addition to this we have recently taken out a high-court injunction to enable us to legally refuse payment. However, in Belgium the courts do not ask why a debt has not been paid, i
