Were projects formally monitored or evaluated to compare results with planned objectives or to determine effectiveness?
The Highway Safety Act of 1966 established the development of standards that would be the heart of state traffic safety programs. Beginning in 1967, the Federal traffic safety program included 18 highway safety program standards covering a wide range of safety issues. In 1982, grant funding was sharply curtailed and the grant program was refocused to cover priority safety areas based on guidelines rather than standards. The priority safety areas were based on analysis of crash data to determine where the major safety problems existed and for which methods were available or could be developed for addressing these problem areas. Until recently, the approval process was based on the states preparing a Highway Safety Plan (HSP), which included a discussion of crash data and the identification of safety problems to be addressed. The following is a discussion by priority area. Impaired Driving The 1980-1993 period was characterized by a remarkable increase in public awareness and government
Related Questions
- If the software process of our company or agency is evaluated using the SCAMPI method, is it possible to compare the results with those obtained by the rest of the industry?
- What if expected projects, planned for the future, but not formally proposed, were included in an Urban Water Management Plan?
- Can ARDT results be used to determine placement in Algebra 1 classes?
