Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

We didn’t win Blais at the Supreme Court of Canada – does this mean Métis in the Prairie Provinces do not have harvesting rights?

0
Posted

We didn’t win Blais at the Supreme Court of Canada – does this mean Métis in the Prairie Provinces do not have harvesting rights?

0

No, Blais does not mean that. The loss in Blais just means that Métis cannot claim the additional constitutional protection for harvesting provided to “Indians” by virtue of the Natural Resources Transfer Agreements. However, based on the Powley test Métis communities in the Prairie Provinces can have harvesting rights protected by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. It is also important to note that the the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench (R. v. Morin & Daigneault) has already held that scrip (regardless of its possible effect on Métis land title) did not extinguish Métis harvesting rights.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123