Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was Unanimous Vote by Appellate Panel Required to Overrule Jury, Grant New Trial?

0
Posted

Was Unanimous Vote by Appellate Panel Required to Overrule Jury, Grant New Trial?

0

Kathleen M. Bryan-Wollman et al. v. Corrine C. Domonko [sic], Case no. 2006-1201 8th District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County) ISSUE: This case asks the Supreme Court to determine whether a 2-1 court of appeals decision that vacated a jury verdict in a personal injury case and granted the plaintiff a new trial was based on a finding that the jury verdict was “against the manifest weight of the evidence,” and therefore required a unanimous vote of the three-judge appellate panel. BACKGROUND: Kathleen Bryan-Wollman of Cleveland filed a personal injury suit against Corrine Domonkos, claiming neck, back and head injuries and ongoing medical symptoms as a result of a 1999 traffic accident in which Domonkos’ car rear-ended a vehicle in which Bryan-Wollman was a passenger. At trial, attorneys for Domonkos introduced medical records showing that Bryan-Wollman had suffered back injuries in a 1983 traffic accident, and that she had sought periodic medical treatment since that accident for a nu

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123