Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was the study funded by a source clearly independent of the tobacco industry?

0
Posted

Was the study funded by a source clearly independent of the tobacco industry?

0

A review of the studies that were available in 2003 concluded that those that met all three criteria found no negative economic impact on businesses following the enactment of smoke-free ordinances. In some cases, there were even slight increases. Of the studies that that did find negative economic impact, none were based on objective data; only one was peer-reviewed, and all were funded by the tobacco industry or one of their front groups. A growing number of subsequent studies meeting these criteria confirm this conclusion. Despite the oft-made prediction that smoke-free ordinance will cause restaurants and bars to close, such was not evident for Columbia. While Missouri saw an increase of 5.8% in the number of restaurants and bars, Jefferson City saw a larger increase at 8.7%, but Columbia saw an increase of 18.3%, more than twice the percentage increase for Jefferson City and more than three times that for Missouri. In fact, the smallest number of restaurants and bars operating in

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123