Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

WAS THE RELEASE FROM ARREST BY CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER GAUVIN PROPER AND LAWFUL?

0
Posted

WAS THE RELEASE FROM ARREST BY CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER GAUVIN PROPER AND LAWFUL?

0

At approximately 13.00 hours on December 12, 2000, CWO Gauvin asked for Cpl Hamm to be brought to his office. WO Rice, who was also present, did little talking. At the end of the conversation, CWO Gauvin released Cpl Hamm from arrest and instructed a member to accompany Cpl Hamm to his residence. The DPM PS concluded that, by virtue of QR&O section 105.12 (Release of Arrested Person Unless Conditions Necessary For Retention In Custody Are Met), MCpl Paul should have released Cpl Hamm rather than CWO Gauvin. Section 158(1) of the NDA and QR&O section 105.12 make it clear that it must be the arresting officer who releases the individual under arrest. QR&O section 105.12 and section 158(1) of the NDA state, in part, “A person arrested under this Act shall, as soon as practicable, be released from custody by the person making the arrest […].” The DPM PS directed that CWO Gauvin be advised of the requirements for the release of arrested persons be carried out.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123