Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was Michael Jackson really a more significant musician than Scott Joplin or Louis Armstrong?

0
Posted

Was Michael Jackson really a more significant musician than Scott Joplin or Louis Armstrong?

0

One man’s judgment is another man’s publicity. The wheels of time grind for centuries before significant people and events are sorted out. Even then many of the significant are lost only to be “discovered” anew. What proves to be significant for each of us is trapped in our personal dance. Michael Jackson died. Let the dead bury their dead. The kid sure could dance.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123