Was it right for the U.S to drop the A Bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki ?
This is all dependent on your definition of right. In this context, I would argue that right means that A. the bombs saved more lives than they ended, and B. that the bombs were utilized in the best possible manner. I reject any claim that the bombings were a justified response to Pearl Harbor. Although a great number of Americans died there, those were almost entirely military casualties, and those casualties had been more than repaid by the time the end of the war rolled around. I would say that the bombs did indeed save lives overall. At least one hundred thousand Chinese were dying monthly as a result of the Japanese occupation of much of coastal China. Additionally, had the war been prolonged, one of two things would have brought about the end. The first possibility is internal economic and political collapse, which would have meant a great number of Japanese civilians would have died of starvation and related causes. The second is an American invasion, which would have likely led
