Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was it a real shocker that Coakley lost?

coakley Lost Shocker
0
Posted

Was it a real shocker that Coakley lost?

0

I mean it that way- this election was Martha Coakley’s to lose. She was running for a seat that was held by a Democrat since 1962. She couldn’t have gotten a better chance if the ghost of Ted Kennedy had anointed her himself. Yet, she blew it. Scott Brown did not win as much as Martha Coakley lost, and the reason is because Coakley simply didn’t believe that any Republican could pose a serious challenge to her. Arrogance and pride have been the downfall of many people, and will continue to be so as long as we’re human. Let me put one thing out there right now- I don’t like Scott Brown. I would not have voted for him if I were a resident of Massachusetts. Scott Brown is a man who posed as a moderate while having the National Organization for Marriage run his anti-gay stealth campaign by placing robocalls urging voters to “defeat “radical” Martha Coakley because of her support of same-sex marriage.” Scott Brown was not happy that same-sex marriage became the law in Massachusetts and vote

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123