Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was Fishbourne Typical Of A Roman Villa?

0
Posted

Was Fishbourne Typical Of A Roman Villa?

0

Fishbourne was more of a palace than a typical Roman villa. It has been theorised that Fishbourne was constructed as a reward for Verica of the Atrebates for helping the Roman invasion. The main differences are in scale and luxury. Fishbourne was much larger and more lavishly equipped than most Roman villas. Typical Roman villas are more like well-equipped farms with good accomodation for the inhabitants, somewhat similar to country manor houses, whereas Fishbourne was more of a grand statement and power centre, like Blenheim Palace or similar.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123