Was Ecomomic Growth Likely in Colonial British North America?
Author InfoMancall, Peter C. Weiss, Thomas Abstract Conventional wisdom holds that output per capita in colonial British America increased between 0.3 and 0.6 percent per year. Our conjectural estimates challenge this view, suggesting instead that such growth was unlikely. We show that the most likely rate of economic growth was much lower, probably close to zero. We argue further that to understand the performance of the colonial economy it is necessary to include the economic activity of Native American Indians. When this is done, we estimate that the economy may have grown at the rate suggested by previous researchers. Download InfoTo download: If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Related Questions
- Can I Invest In A Start-Up Enterprise Or Emerging Growth Business And Receive "Freely Tradable" Stock? If Not, What Are The Likely Limitations On The Liquidity Of My Investment?
- Where were the British and Colonial soldiers standing when shots were exchanged across the river?
- Was Ecomomic Growth Likely in Colonial British North America?