To meet the competitive priority, assuming both eligible entities are involved, may either the CBO or the LEA/schools be the applicant?
Either the CBO or the LEA may be the applicant. See page 3 of the RFA under “Who May Apply.” Also refer to the definition of “competitive priority” in the Glossary on page 67 and to pages 21-22, “Attachments and Memoranda of Understanding,” for information about LEA and collaborative partner contributions, roles, and responsibilities in order to meet competitive priority requirements. • If a federally administered program’s grant period ends May 2004, but the program is applying for a one-year no-cost extension, is it eligible to apply this year (for the same schools)? Yes. However, California’s 21st CCLC Program grant funds may be used only to supplement existing funding; they may not be used to supplant existing funding. In this case, with the same schools, one could apply to increase the number of enrollees by 25 percent. • If current 21st CCLC programs don’t meet the absolute eligibility requirements, are they not eligible to apply at all? As stipulated in the RFA under “Applicatio
Related Questions
- Are parochial schools eligible to apply as school sites to serve their student population if they meet the Title I requirements?
- Who will determine if applications meet the priority and, therefore, qualify for the competitive priority points?
- Does the LEA have the flexibility to move mentor positions among its eligible schools?
