Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Am I sacrificing geometric accuracy by using automatic runtime grid generation?

0
Posted

There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Am I sacrificing geometric accuracy by using automatic runtime grid generation?

0

You’re right, there is no such thing as a free lunch. In this case, we’re paying for your lunch! All of the complexity that a user would normally have to deal with when making a mesh has been taken out of your hands and is done at runtime using our innovative techniques. Sacrificing geometric accuracy? You’re actually gaining accuracy over codes that require a grid ahead of time because with CONVERGE, adding resolution at the boundaries (i.e., through fixed embedding or adaptive mesh refinement) results in improved accuracy in near-wall flow predictions. With other codes the accuracy of the geometry is limited to the resolution of the original grid.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123