There is already Esperanto, why do we need Monda?
This is because there are some defects in Esperanto: (1) Esperanto does not use the letters q, w, x and y, but does have the inconvenience of six accented letters — c^, g^, h^, j^, s^ and u~ – which (with the possible exception of the last) are not used in any other language. Because they are peculiar to Esperanto they have to be specially provided just for printing Esperanto. Although the problems this causes are not insuperable, the accents remain a nuisance in various ways, and hinder acceptance of Esperanto. Theoretically the circumflex can be replaced by the letter h, but Esperantists themselves use this alternative very reluctantly, as the result looks very heavy and unattractive. (2) In Esperanto there is an ending -n for the accusative case. That makes the word order more flexible, but complicates grammar, and too much flexibility reduces standadisation . For example, some people like to use the word order of Subject+Verb+Object, others use S+O+V, still others use O+V+S or O+
This is because there are some defects in Esperanto: (1) Esperanto does not use the letters q, w, x and y, but does have the inconvenience of six accented letters — c^, g^, h^, j^, s^ and u~ – which (with the possible exception of the last) are not used in any other language. Because they are peculiar to Esperanto they have to be specially provided just for printing Esperanto. Although the problems this causes are not insuperable, the accents remain a nuisance in various ways, and hinder acceptance of Esperanto. Theoretically the circumflex can be replaced by the letter h, but Esperantists themselves use this alternative very reluctantly, as the result looks very heavy and unattractive. (2) In Esperanto there is an ending -n for the accusative case. That makes the word order more flexible, but complicates grammar, and too much flexibility reduces standardization . For example, some people like to use the word order of Subject+Verb+Object, others use S+O+V, still others use O+V+S or O
