Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

The reasoning above clearly only takes monetary savings into account. But what about personal savings or losses being tallied up when one deals with a natural disaster or a power black-out?

0

I am bringing this up because of the ice-storm power outage that happened just before Christmas on the east coast and put 4.6 million people out of power for weeks. Aside from the inconvenience of having to warm your hands on a burn barrel and having to fix your frozen pipes later — how does that tally and what price would you assign for this? The reliability of the power grid and other utilities brings us to the second motivation for having alternatives. Being totally depending on overhead power lines is equal to signing up for a minor and major disaster to happen at any time — risking your personal and family’s assets and comfort. Insurance companies now have the option for terrorist coverage (in the rare case your personal home would be effected) — yet most insurance companies find a way to get around paying off victims of common natural climatic occurrences. It is really amazing to me that utility companies are not required to provide and guarantee more reliable power — to the

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.