Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

The next logical question is, why aren’t other fractional values of n allowed — for example, 3/2?

allowed fractional values
0
10 Posted

The next logical question is, why aren’t other fractional values of n allowed — for example, 3/2?

0
10

g = 2.π.3/2 = 3.π If n=3/2, a wave does not end where it originates. It effectively oscillates between the points π and 2.π. This is a wave function that moves (changes) in time, and therefore must radiate. All fractional values for n which do not have a 1 either in the numerator or the denominator share this feature. We can generalize this result to say that n can be described as n1/n2 where n1=1 or n2=1 The analysis above is slightly inaccurate with respect to the actual orbitsphere — it has been simplified for illustrative purposes. A one-dimensional line of force propagating along a great circle of the orbitsphere is actually deflected infinitesimally to one side or the other such that it does not quite “overlap itself” over time. Because these one-dimensional lines have no width, an infinitesimal shift in the z dimension does not materially alter the outcome. Given this new understanding of the nature of n, we are able to say that 1/n values produce stable solutions to the electro

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123