Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

The LAB values output by the GretagMacbeth Munsell conversion software are different than those I can input in Photoshop. Any solution for this?

0
Posted

The LAB values output by the GretagMacbeth Munsell conversion software are different than those I can input in Photoshop. Any solution for this?

0

The CIELAB space in Adobe Photoshop is the same space as that used everywhere else including the GretagMacbeth conversion software. All I can imagine is that you are having issues with the encoding. In CIELAB, L* ranges from 0-100, but is encoded as 0-255 in Photoshop. Thus, the Photoshop L values need to be divided by 2.55 to get ordinary L* scaling. For the a* and b* dimensions, there is a simple offset. Photoshop values of 0 to 255 are equivalent to CIELAB a*b* values of -127 to +128. This allows the positive and negative values of CIELAB a* and b* to be represented as simple 8-bit (0-255) numbers in Photoshop. Thus Photoshop a*b* values need to have 127 subtracted from them to get ordinary a*b* scaling. Perhaps it is this conversion that you are missing. (Note that this conversion might only be approximately correct depending on the color management settings in your system, Photoshop, and your software versions, OS, etc.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.