THE COURT: Where is that in the hearsay exceptions? Is it a present sense impression?
MR. MUISE: It explains his actions, Judge. It explains why he’s done, why he’s going to take the actions that he did. You’ll get Dr. Miller complaining that they’re not presenting. He challenges them. That’s all he’s going to testify to. And he’s going to testify that they wrote a joint letter and submitted it off. It explains the purpose of the joint letter. THE COURT: He can say that they wrote a joint letter. I understand that. That’s not what he’s about to do. He’s about to apparently quote Dr. Miller, Professor Miller chapter and versus what he said. I’ll sustain the objection. MR. ROTHSCHILD: And the letter hasn’t been produced either, Your Honor. THE COURT: Well, we’ll get to that. Let’s not anticipate what we don’t have. I’ll sustain the objection to that question. BY MR.
