THE COURT: What was testimony from trial?
MR. MUISE: What I just read, Your Honor. THE COURT: Well, I understand that. That begs the question, the question has been raised by Mr. Harvey’s objection is, is it in his export report. I do not believe it is. I think you can probably concede that point. Obviously it can’t be because the report was prepared prior to Dr. Alters’ testimony. Now, the objection then states that there’s no rebuttal report that contains this. So in effect he’s claiming I think that he’s not qualified, and surprised. What do you say about that? MR. MUISE: Your Honor, he’s testifying about the — THE COURT: I know what — MR. MUISE: I understand that. THE COURT: I know exactly what he’s testifying about. Don’t reiterate what he’s testifying about. Tell me why I should allow the testimony based on the fact that it’s not in the report and that it’s, well, fundamentally not in the report, and I think there’s a qualification objection inherent in this that I allowed Mr. Harvey to reserve. Dr. Alters in his testi
