THE COURT: Anything from the plaintiffs?
MR. WALCZAK: We have no objection to the proposed modification, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. So with that brief change to what is a little bit awkward in the first sentence, the “wherein” — and I don’t mean that facetiously, but just as it relates to this case, because this almost looks like it’s a contracted or — MR. BENN: I understand. I just wanted to make sure the word “affidavit” was in there. THE COURT: We will recite that. We will get a clarifying order out. Now, for the purpose of — because this is a very public trial. What’s your intention, what are your thoughts regarding how we should address this? Because it’s known that this is a festering controversy. MR. BENN: That’s an interesting question. I mean, if we’re not called today, which we’re not going to be, I don’t know that it really is an issue. We just had dialogue in chambers, the judge is going to be entering an order, and after we receive the order, we’ll be able to make a decision in terms of where we proceed
