Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

THE COURT: Any recross, Mr. Walczak?

Court Mr walczak
0
Posted

THE COURT: Any recross, Mr. Walczak?

0

RECROSS EXAMINATION BY MR. WALCZAK: Q Ms. Geesey, if you could look on page 56 again, and Mr. Gillen was reading to you about — asking you about Pandas being discussed at those meetings. And you said, two meetings in June and one in July. He said, did he discuss the book Of Pandas at any of those three meetings, and your answer was yes, is that correct? A That’s what it says there, yes. Q And just reading on three more lines, Mr. Schmidt asked you, “Do you remember which one?” And your answer was “No.” A Correct. MR. WALCZAK: Thank you. No further questions. THE COURT: I have a question before you step down, Mrs. Geesey, because I’m confused. THE WITNESS: So am I. EXAMINATION BY THE COURT: Q Well, it’s more important that I’m not confused than you’re not confused. But the question is this: I read your deposition testimony as it was presented, and it appears to me that your deposition testimony — I’m reading it as clearly as I can — indicates that you answered in the negative, that i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123