The CO2 climate influence seems to be evident and accepted among politicians and principal scientists. Is there any reson to be suspicious?
That’s true. However when politics and axioms start to govern the science history shows that this development is not sustainable. In this case motivation is the search for truth in such a form that it can be understood by all persons, who are interested in this new CO2 world order. Also there are masses scientists, who do not approve the CO2 model, but on the otherhand do not affility to give their opinions freely.
Related Questions
- The CO2 climate influence seems to be evident and accepted among politicians and principal scientists. Is there any reson to be suspicious?
- How difficult has it been to discriminate human influence on climate from natural influences?
- Which plays a stronger role in its impact on climate – atmospheric CO2 or changes in albedo?
