Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility: what is the best approach?

0
Posted

Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility: what is the best approach?

0

A comparative study evaluating the results of three surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with urethral hypermobility. This is a retrospective study of 189 patients, evaluating the outcomes of the percutaneous needle suspension using bone anchors (PNS), abdominal suspension (AS), and pubovaginal sling (PVS). The mean follow-up was 30.5 months. In our results, the patients were divided into three groups: PNS (49), AS (34), and PVS (106). No differences were found preoperatively. Intraoperatively, PNS had the shortest operative time and lowest estimated blood loss, and it is the only outpatient procedure. However, it had the highest complication rate. PNS had the lowest satisfactory rate (16.7%). This was followed by AS (78%), PVS with cadaveric fascia (90%), and PVS with autologous fascia (94%). In conclusion, PNS is a simple outpatient procedure, but the long-term results are disappointing. Both AS and PVS gave good results. PVS was superior to AS in shorter hospita

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123