Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Sure, Pat admitted, Philip Zelikow, was a White House insider extraordinaire. “But what were they to do, honor the necessary transparency of an elected government and seek a truly independent investigation?

0
Posted

Sure, Pat admitted, Philip Zelikow, was a White House insider extraordinaire. “But what were they to do, honor the necessary transparency of an elected government and seek a truly independent investigation?

0

So, it seems the type of transparency Pat fears is the type that would provide outside scrutiny. In other words, they are public officials, not servants! Well if this government is of, by, and for us, and this type of Commission is what we get, then we say, we need not turn exclusively to them, we need to investigate them, as they work for us. We believe the only reason the government would not support and help institute a new independent investigation, is that they fear there is a strong possibility that the truthers have a lot of things correct regarding the happenings on 9/11. If you are new to this please research both sides of this matter for yourself. If it is more research than you want to do/or is overwhelming and TMI, consider this: If the governments official explanation of 9/11 is the “truth” then the Bush administration at best is guilty of gross negligence; at worst it is guilty of treason and war-crimes. Perhaps it was Bush and his administration, or a rogue element withi

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123