Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?

0
Posted

Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?

0

Objective: To examine the relative cost effectiveness of a range of screening and intervention strategies for preventing coronary heart disease in primary care. Subjects: 7840 patients aged 35-64 years who were participants in a trial of modifying coronary heart disease risk factors in primary care. Design: Effectiveness of interventions assumed and the potential years of life gained estimated from a risk equation calculated from Framingham study data. Main outcome measure: The cost per year of life gained. Results: The most cost effective strategy was minimal screening of blood pressure and personal history of vascular disease, which cost pounds sterling310-pounds sterling930 per year of life gained for men and pounds sterling1100-pounds sterling3460 for women excluding treatment of raised blood pressure. The extra cost per life year gained by adding smoking history to the screening was pounds sterling400-pounds sterling6300 in men. All strategies were more cost effective in men than

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123