Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Spam is no worse than postal junk mail, is it?

postal spam worse
0
Posted

Spam is no worse than postal junk mail, is it?

0

Sending postal mail costs money to the sender, both to print and to deliver, so there is a monetary threshold that keeps every company in the country from sending lots of it. That threshold ensures that, while you may receive what you think is an irritating amount of junk, your postal mailbox is not completely flooded with it. Email, on the other hand, costs nothing to the sender therefore there is no monetary barrier or incremental cost to deter how much email spam can be sent. With this in mind, here’s the problem: There are over 30,000,000 businesses in North America alone. If sending postal junk mail cost nothing to print or to deliver and therefore each North American business could freely send you one item of postal junk mail per month, you personally would receive 1,000,000 items of postal junk mail each day. Obviously your post mailbox would not cope even with a tiny fraction of that. Luckily, print and postal delivery costs prevent that ever occurring. But not so with junk ema

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123