Sometimes “non-examples” are helpful to understanding. What would be considered “non-examples” and be unacceptable in emphasizing content from the four core areas?
One of the best “non-examples” is a school that offers services only in language arts. This program would need to be expanded. Another “non-example” would be offering science at one grade level, math at the next grade level, social studies at the next, etc. Opportunities in all four core content areas should be available at each grade level. Students should be served based on individual strengths, and should not be required to participate in all four core areas.
Related Questions
- If an elective course falls into one of the NCLB Core content areas, is the teacher teaching the course subject to Highly Qualified Teacher reporting requirements?
- Sometimes "non-examples" are helpful to understanding. What would be considered "non-examples" and be unacceptable in emphasizing content from the four core areas?
- Where can I find out more information about the State of Idaho NCLB Highly Qualified core content areas and requirements?
