Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Someone might ask, “Well, are tongues a sign to unbelieving Jews or Gentiles?

gentiles Jews tongues
0
Posted

Someone might ask, “Well, are tongues a sign to unbelieving Jews or Gentiles?

0

” They can be. We have already seen Scriptural incidents in which they are not: • When Paul or another believer was praying in tongues in private alone, tongues were obviously not a sign to unbelievers. • And when used in private devotions to worship and praise the Lord, they clearly are a sign to no one but the believer and the Lord. • Tongues were not a sign to unbelievers at Cornelius’ house. • Tongues were not a sign to unbelievers when Paul ministered to the 12 at Ephesus. So Scriptures and common sense limit the use of tongues for a sign to unbelievers to some manifestations of tongues in a public service. Then what is meant by tongues being a sign to unbelievers? I’ve seen this happen in one form or another, a number of times. You see, true speaking in tongues and interpretation is very powerful. These gifts are riveting to observe. Speaking a message in tongues and interpreting it in a public service can have a mighty, convicting effect on an unbeliever. I’ve seen it take place

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123