Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

So, why would surgery for lung cancer be unnecessary or futile?

0
Posted

So, why would surgery for lung cancer be unnecessary or futile?

0

With the traditional diagnostic tools of x-ray and MRI, doctors have been unable to clearly assess the stage of the lung cancer. If it is considered that the cancer is in its early stages and has not spread outside the lung, surgery is the best option for successful removal of the tumor. Unfortunately, what often happens is that, during surgery, it is discovered that the cancer had spread more than was estimated, and therefore cannot be removed by the surgery. In these cases, the surgery was futile. It also happens that, during surgery, the mass seen in the standard tests is actually benign or non-cancerous. A benign tumor doesn’t need to be removed because it is harmless, or at the very least, could have been treated with medication, so this surgery was unnecessary. These reasons are behind the research into PET scans lung cancer.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123