Skeptic sensitives support network?
The only aspects that — as far as I can tell — aren’t disqualified are the motions of the practice, and non-judgementally following its internal logic. Hm, yes, internal logic. I guess I’ll put it this way: I’m non-dualist but ultimately wedded to reason. In practice, this means that I often think rational explanations aren’t useful because not enough data is available to make useful theories. Therefore, I’m more interested in gathering data, as non-judgmentally as possible, yes. I’m ok with a ‘soft’ (social-science level or even folklorist, yeah) approach; I think too often things get cut off by people who’re prejudiced by certain assumptions about the universe. I think this happens to scientifically-minded and religious folks alike in different directions. I’m not interested in the motions of practice alone, though, since they are not illuminating at all. Internal logic is more interesting. By temperament and a bit by training, you can perhaps call me a folklorist. I’m ok with subj
