Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Since the San Antonio Spurs won their fourth NBA title, should they be considered a dynasty?

0
Posted

Since the San Antonio Spurs won their fourth NBA title, should they be considered a dynasty?

0

They are lacking the flash and pizzazz of a true dynasty. I should know. I revolutionized ribbon-dancing with my sparkling multi-colored, jewel encrusted outfits. They’ve been a dynasty for years. The only reason their legacy is still in question is because they aren’t that flashy. Yep. But more than that, they should be recognized for their dynasty of community service in addition to basketball skills. Dynasty is thrown around too loosely. They aren’t the Bulls, Celtics or Lakers. Good team, but not a dynasty. Question 4: In light of a recent suggestion that New York Yankees slugger Jason Giambi used steroids, how bad is the steroid problem in baseball? Steroids make athletes far too bulky – the exact opposite of a true ribbon dancer. Plus, the back acne associated with steroids isn’t flattering in backless ribbon dancing attire. The steroid problem in baseball has been terrible for years. When players’ forearms are three times the size of the bats they’re wielding, it’s time to reass

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123