Since the Internet is generally accessible anywhere in the world, why wouldn it be proper for any county or state court to hear and determine a case like Mr. Hvides?
Because issues relating to jurisdiction in Internet cases are of relatively recent origin, there is not yet a wealth of case law which has completely outlined the parameters of when jurisdiction is and is not proper. However, long before the Internet was ever created, the United States Supreme Court explained that the mere act of placing a physical product into the “stream of commerce,” which stretches across the country, is insufficient to tie an individual or company to a particular state for purposes of jurisdiction. Therefore, without a purposeful act connecting someone to what is commonly referred to as a “forum state,” a court in that state is without power and authority to hear any dispute that may arise. Similarly, recent cases in both the state and federal courts have affirmed this same principle in the context of Internet-based disputes. That is to say, while the creation of a web site may be similar to placing a product into the stream of commerce-and thus be felt nationwide
Related Questions
- When I register for the GoToTrafficSchool.com Georgetown County Circuit Court South Carolina internet defensive driving course, how can I be sure that my personal information is protected?
- What are the different payment options for the GoToTrafficSchool.com Georgetown County Circuit Court South Carolina internet driver safety course?
- What means does the Irwin County Superior Court Georgia traffic school internet course use to safeguard customers’ personal information?
