Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Since only eternity is real, why not use the illusion of time constructively?

0
Posted

Since only eternity is real, why not use the illusion of time constructively?

0

You might remember that underneath are the Everlasting Arms. These comments have no context; there is no related material surrounding them. They stand alone, and as you can see, are quite brief. Yet they grow on you. The more I think about them, the more I see in them. Further, they are significant in a historical sense. They are the very first reference to the idea of reality versus illusion, the notion that eternity is real and time is an illusion. (The lines “Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists” were actually dictated later.) This contrast between reality and illusion, of course, would become the philosophical backbone of the Course. Before this point, the closest references we had were two mentions of “lower-order reality,” which referred to the physical level. Yet obviously, even a lower-order reality still has reality. For good reason, then, these references were changed by the editors to the “bodily level.” The above passage, however, foreshadows so much more t

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123