Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should we really call him Hawkman III, since there never was a Hawkman II?

hawkman ii
0
Posted

Should we really call him Hawkman III, since there never was a Hawkman II?

0

For the purposes of this FAQ, yes, to avoid confusion. Also, as an impostor Hawkman did exist between Hawkman I and Hawkman III, we can always claim him as Hawkman II.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123