Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should we have human rights without accepting responsibilities? Should rights be removed from offenders?

0
Posted

Should we have human rights without accepting responsibilities? Should rights be removed from offenders?

0

The big mistake was to give individual right of access to the Court of Human Rights. It is not a privilege given by other signatories to the relevant agreements. This is what causes the overwhelming majority of Human Rights cases to emanate from the UK and for the taxpayer to fund them. Were we to try to remove the rights claimed by offenders, Strasbourg would clamp down heavily against the British government and defend the rights of the most scurrilous of villains. That is the mess we have got ourselves into. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6755129.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123