Should the Nobel Prize Committee create a new prize category for the environment?
Yes, If someone will transform living obstacles into living opticals they should be a Nobel Prize winner for the environment. People look around obstacles not around opticals. The reason that the price of television and television service has gone up is because people have let they’re outdoor environment remain dormant. That’s what happened to real estate. When people don’t use their real estate they move hoping to get a change of environment. When the observer is able to observe the outdoor environment grow around them the environment is lively. It is the process or technique of photography that keeps people indoors, therefore the same process can be used to get people into an outdoor environment without the use of film. People get tired of decorating obstacles to make an optical and illuminating obstacles that they will look around to see where they have decorated, that is the costly sum. If you can’t watch it grow it’s not alive. Make the efficient romance, keep it alive. Yours trul
Related Questions
- Doris Lessing is only the 11th woman to wind the Nobel Prize for Literature - are men better writers than women? Or has the Nobel Foundation been misogynistic for most of its history?
- Who is the only man without a post-bachelor degree to win a Nobel Prize in the sciences?
- Should the Nobel Prize Committee create a new prize category for the environment?
