Should the government charge more money for the use of federal land and resources by private interests?
Yes. However it would be better for there to be much less federal lands as such are not as productive as land in private hands. I do insist that the full market value via public sale be paid for the lease or sale of public lands. 23. Should landowners be compensated if federal laws restrict what they can do to their private property for environmental or other reasons? Yes. Such laws are a ‘taking’ by the federal regime, and as such should be compensated. 24. Does the federal government need to be more or less involved in improving the environment? Less involved. How does one improve on Nature? 25. What countries or parts of the world do you think deserve particular American attention over the next few years, and why? Whichever countries we rush into in order to meddle will provide the disaster of the moment. Doubtless the situation will continue to decline in the Middle East; but given the hollow nature of our forces, our declining abilities and resources to overawe the rest of the wor
Related Questions
- Does the federal government have a monopoly on money, or can people use private money to conduct transactions?
- Should the government charge more money for the use of federal land and resources by private interests?
- Has ARRC been able to recover any money from the previous owner of the property, the federal government?
