Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should surgical pleurectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax be always thoracoscopic?

0
Posted

Should surgical pleurectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax be always thoracoscopic?

0

Fifty-seven patients were studied over a period of three years to analyse the efficacy of surgical pleurectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Thirty-one and 26 patients underwent open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleurectomy, respectively. VATS was the main modality used for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) (21 vs. 8). However, secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) was mainly managed with open pleurectomy (23 vs. 5). The median operating time was significantly longer in open group (72.4 vs. 55 min; P=0.005). The amount of analgesia required in the first five days was significantly more in open group (108 mg vs. 46.9 mg; P=0.02). Chest drainage was significantly more in open group (1027.1 ml vs. 652.8 ml; P=0.04). However, chest drain duration and hospital stay had no significant difference. VATS emerged as a cost-effective modality (1770 pounds vs. 3226 pounds). The ability to return to work was significantly earlier in VATS group in PSP patients (6 weeks vs.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123