Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should s 228(1) expressly advert to both types of conflict?

Advert conflict expressly types
0
Posted

Should s 228(1) expressly advert to both types of conflict?

0

Transaction other than contracts and proposed contracts 5.1 Section 228(1) requires a declaration only in respect of a contract or proposed contract. It does not cover dispositions of property unrelated to a contract, such as a trust. 5.2 In the United Kingdom in the equivalent of s 228 the Companies Act 1985 s 317(5) provides: “A reference in this section to a contract includes any transaction or arrangement (whether or not constituting a contract) made or entered into on or after 22 December 1980”. – 8 – 5.3 Should s 228(1) require a declaration in respect of a “transaction or proposed transaction”? Transactions that do not come before the board 6.1 The mischief at which s 228 is aimed would seem to be the existence of a director’s unauthorised interest in a company transaction whether it comes to the board or not. 6.2 The Ontario Business Corporations Act 1982 s 132(4) requires that a director shall disclose in writing to the corporation or request to have entered in the minutes of

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123