Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should patients with the “flu-like” or “mono-like” illness of primary HIV infection be treated?

0
Posted

Should patients with the “flu-like” or “mono-like” illness of primary HIV infection be treated?

0

There are theoretical reasons why patients identified with HIV around the time they are first infected (primary, acute infection) may benefit from the immediate initiation of potent antiviral therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that unique aspects of the body’s immune response to the virus may be preserved by this strategy. It is thought that treatment during the primary infection may be an opportunity to help the body’s natural defense system to work against HIV. Thus, patients may gain improved control of their infection while on therapy and perhaps even after therapy is stopped. At one time, the hope was that if therapy was started very early in the course of the infection HIV could be eradicated. Most evidence today however suggests that this is not the case. Consequently, early treatment is not likely to result in a cure, although other benefits may still exist. The current recommendation is that patients with primary infection should be referred to clinical studies where the p

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123