Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should Imperial County Have Standing to Defend Proposition 8 in a New Trial?

0
Posted

Should Imperial County Have Standing to Defend Proposition 8 in a New Trial?

0

As for whether Imperial County should be allowed to defend Proposition 8, I express no firm conclusion, but I have my doubts about the County’s position. True, County officials — unlike the Proposition 8 sponsors — include elected representatives. But these county clerks are elected not by a statewide electorate. Instead, they are chosen by a local (and perhaps unrepresentative) constituency. For this reason, when issues (like marriage) arise that involve statewide legal systems and statewide policy concerns, letting counties speak on behalf of the state — especially when executive officials who are elected statewide (like the Governor and Attorney General) disagree with the position that those counties are taking — would seem to be problematic. Indeed, that appeared to be one of the big reasons why the California Supreme Court held, in the early stages of California’s same-sex marriage saga, that San Francisco county (led by Mayor Gavin Newsom) could not go its own way in 2004 in

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123