Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should I generate ionization and tautomeric states when adding molecules to my Phase database?

0
Posted

Should I generate ionization and tautomeric states when adding molecules to my Phase database?

0

There is no recommended procedure for generating ionization and tautomeric states for a Phase database, because the decision depends on the specific molecules and their intended purpose. Any decision should take into account the following issues: • The Phase feature definitions can account for most common ionic forms even if the structures are neutral: the SMARTS patterns for ionizable groups can be included in the relevant positive ion or negative ion feature definitions. • Generating ionization and tautomeric states can provide better coverage of the possible states, but can significantly increase the disk space used. • Inclusion of tautomeric states can result in unusual hits, such as a donor mapped to an enol. These possibilities might require the addition of more patterns to the feature definitions to exclude unreasonable hits. The CAC database, distributed with Phase, includes ions and tautomers generated at pH 7 ± 2, with the two most stable states retained. Including 4 tautomer

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123