Should George W Bush be tried for war crimes?
Most respected academic and former Department of Justice lawyers agree that the Bush administration is guilty of war crimes. The disagreement amongst them stems from either points of law in the viability of war crimes trials or the reasons for conducting them in the first place. Should they be held in order to finally understand the administration’s thinking behind their war policies, or are there other methods for discovering and uncovering the massive amount of secrets buried deep within the bowels of various agencies, such as the Dept. of Justice, the CIA, the NSA and most of all within the Pentagon? Scott Horton, the well known human rights lawyer, believes that democracy itself is at stake. • “Pursuing the Bush Administration for crimes long known to the public may amount to a kind of hypocrisy, but it is a necessary hypocrisy. The alternative, simply doing nothing, not only ratifies torture; it ratifies the failure of the people to control the actions of their government.” Jack B
Yes of course. He is a skull and bones Satanist who pretends to be a Christian. He is a new world order puppet and or pawn of the big bankers such as Rothschild and Rockefeller who cant wait to have a one world government such as was Hitler’s dream. He is the man who when asked about the events of 9/11 by young child on national TV stated he thought it was pilot error and didn’t think much of it. He is one of many in the government who knew ahead of time the NWO plans to destroy the world trade centre and blame it on some idiot in a cave. He is one of many in the government who profit from the war in Iraq. He is the grandson of Prescott Bush who helped fund Hitler’s cause. He is the brother of Marvin Bush who was in charge of security at the world trade centre as well as the airport in question. He is one of many in the government who helped hide the fact and still do today, that 9/11 was an inside job. He and his father have been good friends of the Binladin family for many years He h
