Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should fertilization and/or syngamy form part of the biological definition of human embryo?

0
Posted

Should fertilization and/or syngamy form part of the biological definition of human embryo?

0

A number of the emerging technologies summarized in Table I do not involve the contribution of chromosomal DNA by both a sperm and an oocyte or the completion of syngamy (reproductive techniques 2, 5 7, 9 11 and 16 17). However, some of these techniques, if conducted using human materials, might have the potential to produce a live human birth. Given this, it would be expected that a human embryo would be created during the developmental processes initiated using these techniques. The inclusion of fertilization and syngamy as necessary elements in a definition of human embryo , would eliminate emerging technologies that have the potential (even if theoretical at present) to produce a new human being. Therefore, an absolute requirement for fertilization and/or syngamy may not be appropriate for the biological definition of a human embryo. Should the biological definition of human embryo exclude techniques combining DNA from more than one species? Some emerging technologies could theoret

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123