Should documents related to research, development, or test activities conducted in support of the Yucca Mountain project at sites other than Yucca Mountain be included in the LSN?
A. Yes. As explained in the Scientific and Technical sections of the FAQs, the conduct of and results of such activities should be included in the LSN. However, documents describing specific information about the facilities in which research, development or test activities were conducted should not be included in the LSN. For example, while the conduct of and results of research performed at the E-MAD facility on the Nevada Test Site in support of the Yucca Mountain program should be included in the LSN, facility-specific information about the E-MAD structure, safety systems, maintenance records, etc., should not be included.
Related Questions
- Should documents related to research, development, or test activities conducted in support of the Yucca Mountain project at sites other than Yucca Mountain be included in the LSN?
- Does the tool support multiple metadata object definitions over project or lifecycle phases - such as "Test", "Development", "Production", "Release 1.1", etc …?
- Does the tool support multiple metadata object definitions over project or lifecycle phases - such as "Test", "Development", "Production", "Release 1.1", etc …?
- Are documents related to waste package research, development and testing activities required to be included in the LSN?
- Are documents related to waste package research, development and testing activities required to be included in the LSN?
- What does Support and administration for research activities (R1) include?
