Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should different countries and projects define a different suite of A-grade browsers?

0
Posted

Should different countries and projects define a different suite of A-grade browsers?

0

A globally consistent approach advances our goal of maximum availability and accessibility. Even if data indicate a particular distribution of browser usage in a particular country, welcoming users from anywhere on the globe is optimal. This is a best practice and recommendation, but not a mandate. Further, the reduction of visual and functional “cliffs” between sites and products can encourage user exploration. The same concept applies to project-specific determinations. Question: “Why is the chart updated quarterly?” A key benefit of GBS is the sanity it can bring to QA and development processes. If the A-grade membership shifts too quickly, these benefits disappear. Quarterly updates balance responsiveness to market conditions with a reduction in development environment volatility. Question: “What about mobile devices?” While mobile and living room devices can benefit from a GBS approach, this article and chart address desktop browsers only.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123