Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should determination of the karyotype be systematic for all malformations detected by obstetrical ultrasound?

0
10 Posted

Should determination of the karyotype be systematic for all malformations detected by obstetrical ultrasound?

0
10

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether karyotyping should be performed for every fetal malformation detected in low risk populations. METHODS: A karyotype was obtained from 428 fetuses examined over a 10-year period after fetal malformation was diagnosed using obstetrical ultrasound. These fetuses were separated into two groups, one with isolated malformations and the other with multiple malformations. The association between each type of malformation and the result of karyotype was evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-eight chromosomal abnormalities were encountered in 428 fetuses (11.2%). The karyotype was abnormal in 32/343 (9.3%) fetuses with isolated malformations and 16/85 (18.8%) fetuses with multiple malformations (p=0.022). The probability of an abnormal karyotype among the group of isolated malformation depended on the anatomical system involved (p<0.001). Our study demonstrated several isolated malformations without chromosomal abnormality (hydronephrosis with high o

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123