Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should corporations be concerned about conflicting technologies when they layer different security strategies?

0
Posted

Should corporations be concerned about conflicting technologies when they layer different security strategies?

0

Pappas: Having more than one type of protection is not a bad thing. Corporations don’t have to worry about conflicting technologies. They need to apply a good business sense and look at what various security companies offer. One approach will compliment another one. TNW: Is there any concern about a false sense of network security? Pappas: Yes. Corporations need to be regularly audited by security experts. For instance, the Hannaford Bros. breach wasn’t prevented just because the company was PCI compliant [Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard]. As was demonstrated, networks can still get hacked. TNW: What have you seen on the corporate level that leads to a false sense of security regarding network protection? Pappas: There are several reasons why some corporations are more susceptible to hackers than others. One is corporate officers already believe they have protection. A second reason is that the corporation may be under budget constraints. The management team then decides t

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123