Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should California voters worry about Schwarzeneggers past steroid use?

0
10 Posted

Should California voters worry about Schwarzeneggers past steroid use?

0
10

Depends on whether you believe scientists — or tales of ‘roid rage. By David Gilson Sep. 30, 2003 | Of all the California gubernatorial candidates, only one has inspired a nickname for a Schedule 3 controlled substance. The candidate is Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the substance is anabolic steroids, or — as some illicit users have dubbed them — “Arnolds.” It’s only fitting that Schwarzenegger is immortalized in this way, since he epitomizes the promise of steroids: monstrously big muscles that can morph a scrawny nobody into a ripped he-man with health, wealth, popularity — and maybe even a shot at running the most populous state in the country. The past steroid use of the seven-time Mr. Olympia, five-time Mr. Universe, and one-time Mr. World is no secret. Schwarzenegger portrays his doping as a youthful indiscretion that, despite its career-enhancing effects, he would prefer to put behind him. Appearing on “Larry King Live” in August, he said that using steroids “was stupid, becaus

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123