Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should budget airlines be used for connections or as feeders?

0
Posted

Should budget airlines be used for connections or as feeders?

0

There have been a few posts on this forum about people booking flights on budget airlines as if they are getting connecting flights, allowing only a few hours to make the ‘connection’. The post usually continues with a comment about how critical it is to make the ‘connection’. The problem with this is that they aren’t connections. Passengers have to retrieve and recheck their luggage. The budget airlines frequently have a separate terminal, which means another trip through security, too. If you are arriving on a large plane, it can take a fair amount of time just to debark. And most important, since it is not a connection, there is no protection if you miss a flight because the first flight is delayed. That means that if your second flight is on the budget airline, your ticket is wasted and you will have to pay for a new one. If your second flight is on a major carrier, they will probably not automatically book you on the next available flight without charge, but will treat you by what

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123